Author:
Golding Nicola,Ashton Jenna,Brown Kate,Chan Steven,Coles Tim,Fowler Hayley,Fuller Elizabeth,Harrison Paula,Harvey-Fishenden Alice,Macdonald Neil,Sefton Christine
Abstract
Abstract
Co-production brought clear benefits to a range of projects across the UK Climate Resilience Programme (UKCR).
Experiences were deeply context specific; dependent on those involved, their motivations and expectations.
A range of barriers currently exist to achieving the benefits of co-production more fully.
Skills associated with using co-productive approaches need to be developed, taught and mentored in the research community.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference27 articles.
1. Miller, C.A. and Wyborn, C. 2020. Co-production in global sustainability: Histories and theories. Environmental Science and Policy 113(2020), pp. 88–95.
2. Carter, S., Steynor, A., Vincent, K., Visman, E. and Waagsaether, K. 2019. Co-production of African weather and climate services. Manual, Cape Town: Future Climate for Africa and Weather and Climate Information Services for Africa [Online] Available at: https://futureclimateafrica.org/coproduction-manual.
3. Vargo, S. and Lusch, R. 2004. Evolving to A New Dominant Logic for Marketing. Journal of Marketing 68, pp. 1–17.
4. Auh, S., Bell, S. J., McLeod, C. S. and Shih, E. 2007. Co-Production and Customer Loyalty in Financial Service. Journal of Retailing 83(3), pp. 359–370.
5. Lember, V., Brandsen, T. and Tõnurist, P. 2019. The potential impacts of digital technologies on co-production and co-creation. Public Management Review 21(11), pp. 1665–1686.