Author:
Nordhoff Verena,Baldi Elisabetta,Hellenkemper Barbara,Nieschlag Eberhard
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference47 articles.
1. Agarwal A, Panner Selvam MK, Sharma R, Master K, Sharma A, Gupta S, Henkel R (2018) Home sperm testing device versus laboratory sperm quality analyzer: comparison of motile sperm concentration. Fertil Steril 110:1277–1284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.08.049
2. Ayad BM, Van der Horst G, Du Plessis SS (2018) Revisiting the relationship between the ejaculatory abstinence period and semen characteristics. Int J Fertil Steril. 11:238–246. https://doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2018.5192
3. Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Yaari S, Katz N, Barr I, Fishman A, Bartoov B (2005) The morphological normalcy of the sperm nucleus and pregnancy rate of intracytoplasmic injection with morphologically selected sperm. Hum Reprod 20:185–190
4. Campbell MJ, Lotti F, Baldi E, Schlatt S, Festin MP, Björndahl L, Toskin I, Barratt CL (2021) Distribution of Semen Examination Results 2020 - a follow up of data collated for the WHO semen analysis manual 2010. Andrology. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.12983
5. Check JH, Tubman A, Wilson C (2013) Intracytoplasmic sperm injection allows normal pregnancy rates for males 40 with low hypoosmotic swelling test scores even when complicated by very low motility percentage. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 40:18–19