The Ambivalences of the Digital—Humans and Technology Between New Dreams/Spaces of Possibility and (Un)Noticeable Losses

Author:

Graßl Hartmut,Bauberger Stefan,Behrens Johann,Bleckmann Paula,Engels Rainer,Göpel Eberhard,Korczak Dieter,Lankau Ralf,Schmiedchen Frank

Abstract

AbstractEvery new technology is used by us humans almost without hesitation. Usually the military use comes first. Examples from recent history are the use of chemical weapons by Germany in the First World War and of atomic bombs in the Second World War by the US. Now, with the rapid advances in microelectronics over the past few decades, a wave of its application, called digitization, is spreading around the world with barely any control mechanisms. In many areas this has simplified and enriched our lives, but it has also encouraged abuse. The adaptation of legislation to contain the obvious excesses of “digitization” such as hate mail and anonymous threats is lagging behind massively. We hear almost nothing about technology assessment through systematic research; it is demanded at most by a few, usually small groups in civil society, which draw attention to the threats to humankind—future and present—and the Earth's ecosystem. One such group, the Federation of German Scientists (VDW) e.V., in the spirit of the responsibility of science for the peaceful and considered application of the possibilities it creates, asked three of its study groups to jointly organize its 2019 Annual Conference. The study groups “Health in Social Change,” “Education and Digitization,” and “Technology Assessment of Digitization” formulated the following position paper for the 2019 VDW Annual Conference, entitled “Ambivalences of the Digital.”

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference56 articles.

1. Assis-Hassid, S., Heart, T., Reychav, I., & Pliskin, J. S. (2016). Modelling factors affecting patient–doctor–computer communication in primary care. International Journal of Reliable and Quality E-Healthcare (IJRQEH), 5(1), 17ff. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJRQEH.2016010101

2. Bartels, J. (2017). What’s all this silence? Computer centered communication in patient doctor computer communication. In J. Bartels (Ed.), Health professionals education in the age of health information systems, mobile computing and social networks (pp. 23–34). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805362-1.00002-4

3. Behrens, J. (2019). Theorie der Pflege und der Therapie. Hogrefe.

4. Behrens, J., & Langer, G. (2016). Evidence based nursing and caring: Methoden und Ethik der Pflegepraxis und Versorgungsforschung – Vertrauensbildende Entzauberung der “Wissenschaft”. Hogrefe.

5. Bittner, J., Dockweiler, C., & Thranberend, T. (2018). Roadmap Digitale Gesundheit Handlungsempfehlungen für eine Digitalisierung im Dienst der Gesundheit. In U. Repschläger, C. Schulte, & N. Osterkampf (Eds.), BARMER Gesundheitswesen aktuell (pp. 62–91).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3