Changing Policy Advisory Dynamics in the 2000s: The Advisory Roles of Political Scientists in Turkey

Author:

Bakir Caner,Bolukbasi H. Tolga

Abstract

AbstractThis chapter maps the changing features of the policy advisory system in Turkey and explores the policy advisory roles of Turkish political scientists in the 2000s. It situates Turkey’s statist policy advisory system in an environment of increasing centralization of executive power in a hybrid regime. In this system, government actors dictate the terms of engagement for key policy actors. They do so against the background of externalization, politicization, privatization, Europeanization and societalization of advice. In addition to case study material, the chapter relies on the ProSEPS survey. According to the survey findings, the typical political scientist in Turkey is a male opinionator, who gives generally informal face-to-face advice to mostly civil society organizations, think tanks and civil servants. This opinionator is an expert in international relations, comparative politics and political theory. Political scientists in Turkey’s advisory system do not differ markedly from their European colleagues in terms of their demographic characteristics, educational attainment, employment status, specialization subfields, channels they use and levels of governance they provide advice at. The chapter concludes by calling for further research on the advisory roles of political scientists in this hybrid regime.

Funder

COST Network

University of Siena

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference29 articles.

1. Bakir, C. (2020). The Turkish state’s responses to existential COVID-19 crisis. Policy and Society, 39(3), 424–441.

2. Bakir, C., & Ertan, G. (2018). Pushing the pendulum from politics to policy: The state of policy analysis in Turkey. In C. Bakir & G. Ertan (Eds.), Policy analysis in Turkey (pp. 1–16). Bristol University Press.

3. Blum, S., & Brans, M. (2017). Academic policy analysis and research utilization for policymaking. In M. Brans, I. Geva-May, & M. Howlett (Eds.), Handbook of comparative policy analysis (pp. 341–359). Routledge.

4. Bolukbasi, H. T., & Ertugal, E. (2019). Napoleonic tradition, majoritarianism and Turkey’s statist policy style. In M. Howlett & J. Tosun (Eds.), Policy styles and policy-making: Exploring the linkages (pp. 351–374). Routledge.

5. Bolukbasi, H. T., Ertugal, E., & Ozcurumez, S. (2018). Europeanisation of policy-making in Turkey and its limits. In C. Bakır & G. Ertan (Eds.), Policy analysis in Turkey (pp. 165–184). Routledge.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3