Author:
Pritoni Andrea,Galanti Maria Tullia
Abstract
AbstractTo date, no systematic attempt has been made to describe the main features of the Italian policy advisory system. In particular, we know very little about the role of political scientists within it. This study addresses precisely this gap in the literature. First, by presenting original data derived from an online survey to which 177 Italian political scientists responded, we reconstruct frequency, type, recipient(s), and areas of their (potential) policy advice. Second, by focusing on two very relevant policy processes—the approval of the so-called Italicum (electoral law) and of the so-called Jobs Act (labour market reform)—we add insightful qualitative details to our quantitative analysis. Empirical results show that Italian political scientists are seldom engaged in policy advisory activities: many of them have never been. Moreover, there are no particular differences—from the point of view of personal characteristics (gender and level of academic career)—between policy advisors and the so-called pure academics. Finally, as the two case studies show, informal advice has the greatest impact on policymaking. This latter aspect reminds us of how much the Italian policy advisory system (PAS) is still poorly institutionalised and largely based on personal relationships as well as on political proximity.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference27 articles.
1. Blum, S., & Brans, M. (2017). Academic policy analysis and research utilization for policymaking. In M. Brans, I. Geva-May, & M. Howlett (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Comparative Policy Analysis (pp. 341–359). Routledge.
2. Bouwen, P. (2002). Corporate lobbying in the European Union: the logic of access. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(3), 365–390.
3. Capano, G., & Gualmini, E. (2011). La pubblica amministrazione in Italia. seconda edizione, Bologna: Il Mulino.
4. Capano, G., & Vassallo, S. (Eds.). (2003). La dirigenza pubblica. Il mercato e le competenze dei ruoli manageriali. Rubbettino.
5. Capano, G., & Verzichelli, L. (2016). Looking for eclecticism? Structural and contextual factors underlying political science’s relevance gap: evidence from the Italian case. European Political Science, 15(2), 211–232.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献