Author:
Brans Marleen,Timmermans Arco,Gouglas Athanassios
Abstract
AbstractThis chapter presents a theoretical perspective for studying the policy advisory roles of political scientists, drawing upon literature on knowledge utilization and policy advisory systems. It first proposes a locational model as a heuristic tool for mapping the advisory activities of academic political scientists in the academic, government and societal arenas, and the intersections between these. For comparative purposes, it considers policy advisory systems as on the one hand reflecting civic epistemologies and political-administrative social systems within countries, and on the other hand as being subject to such global trends towards the externalization and politicization of advice. Secondly, it defines what policy advice is, how its content may vary, and how, to whom, and at which levels of government it is communicated. Thirdly, in order to distinguish engagements and activities of individual academics engaging in advisory work, the chapter construct a typology of four advisory roles: the pure academic, the expert, the opinionating scholar, and the public intellectual.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference54 articles.
1. Althaus, M. (2013). Reflections on advisory practice in politics. Political Science Applied, 1(2), 25–30.
2. Aubin, A., & Brans, M. (2021). Styles of policy advice: A typology for comparing the standard operating procedures for the provision of policy advice. In M. Howlett & J. Tonsun (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of policy styles (pp. 286–299). Routledge.
3. Bandola-Gill, J., Flinders, M. & Brans, M. (2021). Incentives for impact: Relevance regimes through a cross-national perspective. In R. Eisfeld & M. Flinders (Eds.), Political science in the shadow of the state: Research, relevance & deference. (pp. 35–63). Palgrave Macmillan.
4. Bekkers, V. (2014). Contested knowledge in theory-driven policy analysis: Setting the Dutch stage. In F. van Nispen & P. Scholten (Eds.), Policy analysis in the Netherlands (pp. 231–247). Policy Press.
5. Blum, S. (2018). The multiple-streams framework and knowledge utilisation: Argumentative couplings of problem, policy, and politics issues. European Policy Analysis, 4(1), 94–117.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献