Removing Political Barriers to Engagement: The Advisory Roles of Political Scientists in Albania

Author:

Xhindi Nevila,Bino Blerjana

Abstract

AbstractThis chapter analyzes Albania’s policy advisory system focusing on the advisory roles of political scientists. Albania’s political science discipline is relatively new, as it has mainly developed since the turn of the century. After exploring how the policy development process happens and how different factors may hinder the demand for Albania’s policy advice, this chapter considers political scientists’ role within the national context. Political barriers limit the role of political scientists in the policy process. In general, Albanian political scientists do engage in policy advice, but not in a structured and well-organized way. Mostly it is informal and based on a network of connections. Also, in the Albanian system, they have little incentives for such engagement external to their university work. Political scientists engage in policy advice more with societal actors than directly with legislative or executive institutions and officials. Future research may include the demand side of policy advice to understand the role of political scientists better and provide clues for their future engagement.

Funder

COST Network

University of Siena

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference12 articles.

1. Bejko, E., & Dauti, M. (2019). The politics of evidence-based policymaking in Albania: Implications for human rights advocates. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, 4, 83–90.

2. Bino, B., Qirjazi, R., & Xhafa, A. (2020). CSO participation in decision making in Albania. IDM. https://idmalbania.org/report-cso-participation-in-decision-making-in-albania/

3. Bowers, S. R. (1989). Stalinism in Albania: Domestic affairs under Enver Hoxha. East European Quarterly, XXII(4), 441–456.

4. Dauti, M., & Bejko, E. (2015). Use of scientific evidence in designing social protection policies in Albania (National Policy Dialogue in Albania). Institute for Democracy and Mediation. http://idmalbania.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/RRPP_Policy-Document-no1-Albania.pdf

5. Eisfeld, R. (2012). Radical approaches to political science: Roads less traveled. Barbara Budrich Publishers.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3