Abstract
AbstractIn order to understand how regularities in administrative practice are produced, the shaping of administrative caseworkers’ discretionary practices must be studied. This chapter adopts a holistic way of doing so, arguing that regulatory frameworks, the structural conditions of bureaucratic decision-making, the ideological environments administrations are embedded in as well as professional norms and values shape administrative caseworkers’ practices. Furthermore, the chapter argues that officials develop specific dispositions through organisational socialisation. For this purpose, building on Bourdieu, the concept of the institutional habitus is introduced. The chapter argues that the institutional habitus not only shapes everyday administrative practice but also reaffirms the very regulatory constraints, norms and values that lie at its heart. With regard to the empirical focus of this book—credibility assessments in asylum procedures—the concept of the institutional habitus allows us to analytically grasp the socialised subjectivity which emerges out of caseworkers’ socialisation in the office.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference111 articles.
1. Affolter, Laura, Jonathan Miaz, and Ephraim Poertner. 2019. “Taking the ‘Just’ Decision: Caseworkers and Their Communities of Interpretation in the Swiss Asylum Office.” In Asylum Determination in Europe: Ethnographic Perspectives, edited by Nick Gill, and Anthony Good, 263–284. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
2. Alpes, Maybritt Jill, and Alexis Spire. 2014. “Dealing with Law in Migration Control: The Powers of Street-Level Bureaucrats at French Consulates.” Social & Legal Studies 23 (2): 261–274. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0964663913510927.
3. Amnesty International/Still Human Still Here. 2013. “A Question of Credibility: Why so Many Initial Asylum Decisions Are Overturned on Appeal in the UK.” http://www.refworld.org/docid/518120c64.html, last accessed February 3, 2020.
4. Anderson, Jessica, Jeannine Hollaus, Annelisa Lindsay, and Collin Williamson. 2014. The Culture of Disbelief: An Ethnographic Approach to Understanding an Under-Theorised Concept in the UK Asylum System. Working Paper Series No. 102. Oxford: Refugee Studies Centre. https://www.rsc.ox.ac.uk/files/files-1/wp102-culture-of-disbelief-2014.pdf, last accessed February 3, 2020.
5. Anker, Deborah. 1991. “Determining Asylum Claims in the United States: An Empirical Case Study.” http://repository.forcedmigration.org/show_metadata.jsp?pid=fmo:709, last accessed February 3, 2020.