Practical Ethics: Urban Agriculture in US Cities

Author:

DeMarsh Nick,Morales AlfonsoORCID

Abstract

AbstractUrban agriculture provides the opportunity to challenge the status quo within our current urban and food systems. The increased number and density of people in a city creates opportunities and challenges for urban agriculture. Howe and Kaufman’s ethical framework of means and ends is one way to frame urban agriculture. An emphasis on both means and ends is useful given the tendency for ethical ends (or outcomes, economic or otherwise) to preempt considerations for ethical means or processes. Using this framework, we suggest three key ideas to frame ethics of urban agriculture: a place-based historical perspective, a bridge between cities and regions, and a nested approach to reimagining healthy socio-ecological systems. Urban agriculture practitioners must understand the broader history of urban places and agricultural processes as both consequences of national historical processes, in contemporary place specific contexts, and with respect to future goals and orientations to society. The contribution of urban agriculture to environmentally sustainable futures recognizes that food production and consumption is an essential component of human life. The transformative potential of urban agriculture stems from its significant role in two systems that affect everyday life: urban and food systems. This potential for change does not imply that change through urban agriculture practice is inevitable. In this case, change requires that urban agriculture participants and stakeholders critically examine their own practices and expectations. We illustrate how this ethical framework provides an important perspective on the past, present, and future of urban agriculture.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference30 articles.

1. Alberti M (2016) Cities that think like planets: complexity, resilience, and innovation in hybrid ecosystems. University of Washington Press, Seattle

2. Barraclough LR (2009) South Central farmers and Shadow Hills homeowners: land use policy and relational racialization in Los Angeles. Prof Geogr 61:164–186

3. Bernado S (2017) Pathology of displacement: The intersection of food justice and culture. [Online]. WhyHunger. Available: https://whyhunger.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/The_Pathology_of_Displacement_Shane_Bernardo_WhyHunger_FJV_2017_Web.pdf. Accessed 11 July 2019

4. Bonilla-Silva E (2010) Racism without racists: color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in America. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham

5. Brahinsky R (2011) Race and the city: the (re)development of urban identity. Geogr Compass 5:144–153

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3