Theories and Foundations: Ethics, Urban Agriculture, and Planning

Author:

Born BrandenORCID

Abstract

AbstractEarly work in planning for food systems emphasized practice and approaches based on common planning methods over a robust theoretical framework. This may have been a strategic choice, but it is worth re-examining. In this section of five chapters, we develop rationales for why and examples of how theory might be applied to make practice better. The section draws out implied theoretical connections in the first wave of food systems scholarship in planning and begins to outline current food systems planning thought that is explicitly theoretical and pushes scholarship in new directions. One challenge to scholars in food systems planning is to be more critical about how and where their work is situated and the implications of different types of action; we do not want food systems planning to recreate past planning errors. How can such scholarship directly consider justice, empowerment, control, and epistemologies that drive action? And, how might ethical considerations be related to food systems scholarship? This section seeks to demonstrate that theory and ethics can be motivators for advancing the field intellectually and practically.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference13 articles.

1. Anderson MD, Cook JT (1999) Community food security: practice in need of theory? Agri Hum Value 16:141–150

2. Ashman L, De La Vega J, Dohan M, Fisher A, Hippler R, Romain B (1993) Seeds of change: strategies for food security for the inner city. University of California Los Angeles, UCLA Urban Planning Department [Advisors: Robert Gottlieb and Peter Sinsheimer], Los Angeles

3. Bailkey M, Greenstein R (2024) “Farming inside cities” – a look back after two decades. In: Raja S, Caton Campbell M, Judelsohn A, Born B, Morales A (eds) Planning for urban agriculture in the USA: future directions for a new ethic in city building. Springer

4. Clancy K (2004) Potential contributions of planning to community food systems. J Plann Educ Res 23:435–438

5. Faludi A (1973) Planning theory. Pergamon Press, Oxford

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3