Abstract
AbstractChapter10.1007/978-3-030-63266-3_4discusses the emergence, types and functioning of Swiss direct democracy and assesses its effects on power-sharing and the political system more broadly. Contrary to what many theorists have claimed, direct democracy is not too demanding for people in a highly developed industrial society. The fact that citizens have a direct say up to four times a year at federal level, in addition to frequent referendums at cantonalandlocal level, makes voting almost a routine exercise. It also allows today’s losers to become tomorrow’s winners—and vice versa, thus fostering mutual respect and cooperation. Yet contrary also to what some revolutionaries had hoped for, it has not led to radical change either. Instead, direct democracy has above all led to political conservatism, be that regarding welfare policies, defence or European integration.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference67 articles.
1. Aubert, Jean-François. 1974. Petite Histoire Constitutionnelle de la Suisse. Bern: Francke.
2. Aubert, Jean François, and Pascal Mahon. 2003. Petit Commentaire de la Constitution Fédérale de la Confédération Suisse. Zürich: Schulthess.
3. Bachrach, Peter, and Morton S. Baratz. 1963. Decisions and Nondecisions: An Analytical Framework. American Political Science Review 57 (3): 632–642.
4. Bail, Christopher A., Lisa P. Argyle, Taylor W. Brown, John P. Bumpus, Haohan Chen, M.B. Fallin Hunzaker, Jaemin Lee, Marcus Mann, Friedolin Merhout, and Alexander Volfovsky. 2018. Exposure to Opposing Views on Social Media Can Increase Political Polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (37): 9216–9221.
5. BFS – Bundesamt für Statistik [Federal Statistical Office]. 2019. Various data, at www.bfs.admin.ch. Accessed 1 October 2019.