Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference23 articles.
1. Chai, David. 2016. “Rethinking the Daoist Concept of Nature.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 43.3–4: 259–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6253.12262. (Argues that there are multiple, non-contradictory Daoist conceptions of nature, based upon the non-anthropocentric character of Dao).
2. Chen, Guying 陳鼓應. 2014. New Comments on Lao-Zhuang 老莊新論. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan. (Collected essays on various topics related to the interpretation of early Daoism.)
3. Coutinho, Steve. 2004. Zhuangzi and Early Chinese Philosophy. Burlington: Ashgate. (Summarizing assessment of the philosophy of Zhuangzi, with respect both to other pre-Qin schools, and to postmodern Western philosophy.)
4. D’Ambrosio, Paul J. 2020. “Confucianism and Daoism: On the Relationship between the Analects, Laozi, and Zhuangzi, Part I.” Philosophy Compass 15.9. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12702. (First part of an extended essay summarizing the differences between Confucianism and Daoism, with particular focus on semiotics, theories of nature, and theories of the human.)
5. Doyle, Lloyd “Allen”, IV. 2021. “Toward an Ecological Civilization: Perspectives from Daoism.” Journal of Daoist Studies, 14: 221–228. https://doi.org/10.1353/dao.2021.0010. (Argues for a contemporary-friendly concept of the “ecological civilization” already present in the texts of the Laozi and Zhuangzi.)
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Mencius, Zhuangzi and “Daoism”;Dao Companion to the Philosophy of Mencius;2023