The Action Repertoires of the International Organization for the Family—Transnationalizing Far-Right Family Politics

Author:

Koch Timo

Abstract

AbstractMigration and far-right social movement studies have explored exclusionary politics in different national contexts. These works have explained many of the factors contributing to the hostility against minorities on the grounds of religion, race, gender, and sexual identity. Employing the concept of intersectional bordering (Cassidy K, Yuval-Davis N, Wemyss G, Polit Geogr 66:139–141, 2018), the present analysis dissects how religious, conservative, and far-right organizations employ the concept of the family to promote exclusionary politics. To achieve this, the chapter focuses on the International Organization for the Family (IOF), one of the most prominent representatives of this emerging phenomenon (Kalm S, Meeuwisse A, Global Discourse 10:303–320, 2020). I outline three key discursive and mobilization strategies of the IOF: identity formation, the sharing of resources, and knowledge transfer. Analyzing the organization’s repertoires in Russia, Hungary, Moldova, and Germany, I show how transnational collective action is facilitated through the development of common mobilization strategies, the exchange of organizational resources, and online campaigns. The concept of the family thereby becomes an adaptable repertoire creating new exclusions through contentious politics.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference76 articles.

1. Alimi, E. Y. (2015). Repertoires of contention. In D. Della Porta & M. Diani (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social movements (pp. 410–422). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199678402.013.42

2. Association for Life Moldova. (2021). Association for Life Moldova. Moldova Pentru Viata. https://moldovapentruviata.md. Accessed 6 December 2021.

3. Bandy, J., & Smith, J. (Eds.). (2005). Coalitions across borders: Transnational protest and the neoliberal order. Rowman & Littlefield.

4. Barry, S. (2019). Moldovan Pride march met by counter-protestors. Euronews. https://www.euronews.com/2019/05/20/moldovan-pride-march-met-by-opposing-groups

5. Blee, K., & Latif, M. (2021). Sociological survey of the far right. In S. D. Ashe, J. Busher, G. Macklin, & A. Winter (Eds.), Researching the far right: Theory, method and practice (pp. 45–59). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3