Econometric Modelling: Extensions-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Econometric Modelling: Extensions

Published:2020-12-01 Issue: Volume: Page:83-101
ISSN:2191-5504
Container-title:Environmental Valuation with Discrete Choice Experiments
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Mariel Petr^ORCID,Hoyos David^ORCID,Meyerhoff Jürgen^ORCID,Czajkowski Mikolaj^ORCID,Dekker Thijs^ORCID,Glenk Klaus^ORCID,Jacobsen Jette Bredahl^ORCID,Liebe Ulf^ORCID,Olsen Søren Bøye^ORCID,Sagebiel Julian^ORCID,Thiene Mara^ORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis chapter is devoted to advanced issues of econometric modelling. The topics covered are, among others, models in willingness to pay space, the meaning of scale heterogeneity in discrete choice models and the application of various information processing rules such as random regret minimisation or attribute non-attendance. Other topics are anchoring and learning effects when respondents move through a sequence of choice tasks as well as different information processing strategies such as lexicographic preferences or choices based on elimination-by-aspects.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-030-62669-3_6

Reference116 articles.

1. Alemu MH, Mørkbak MR, Olsen SB, Jensen CL (2013) Attending to the reasons for attribute non-attendance in choice experiments. Environ Resource Econ 54:333–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9597-8

2. Aravena C, Hutchinson WG, Carlsson F, Matthews DI (2018) Testing preference formation in learning design contingent valuation using advance information and repetitive treatments. Land Economics 94:284–301. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.94.2.284

3. Bae JH, Rishi M (2018) Increasing consumer participation rates for green pricing programs: a choice experiment for South Korea. Energy Econ 74:490–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.06.027

4. Balbontin C, Hensher DA, Collins AT (2017) Integrating attribute non-attendance and value learning with risk attitudes and perceptual conditioning. Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev 97:172–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2016.11.002

5. Balcombe K, Bitzios M, Fraser I, Haddock-Fraser J (2014) Using attribute importance rankings within discrete Choice experiments: an application to valuing bread attributes. J Agric Econ 65:446–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12051