Experimental Design-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Experimental Design

Published:2020-12-01 Issue: Volume: Page:37-49
ISSN:2191-5504
Container-title:Environmental Valuation with Discrete Choice Experiments
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Mariel Petr^ORCID,Hoyos David^ORCID,Meyerhoff Jürgen^ORCID,Czajkowski Mikolaj^ORCID,Dekker Thijs^ORCID,Glenk Klaus^ORCID,Jacobsen Jette Bredahl^ORCID,Liebe Ulf^ORCID,Olsen Søren Bøye^ORCID,Sagebiel Julian^ORCID,Thiene Mara^ORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis chapter covers various issues related to the experimental design, a statistical technique at the core of a discrete choice experiment. Specifically, it focuses on the dimensionality of a choice experiment and the statistical techniques used to allocate attribute levels to choice tasks. Among others, the pros and cons of orthogonal designs, optimal orthogonal in the differences designs as well as efficient designs are addressed. The last section shows how a simulation exercise can help to test the appropriateness of the experimental design.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-030-62669-3_3

Reference31 articles.

1. Bliemer MCJ, Collins AT (2016) On determining priors for the generation of efficient stated choice experimental designs. J Choice Model 21:10–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2016.03.001

2. Bliemer MCJ, Rose JM (2010) Construction of experimental designs for mixed logit models allowing for correlation across choice observations. Transp Res Part B Method 44:720–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2009.12.004

3. Bliemer MCJ, Rose JM (2011) Experimental design influences on stated choice outputs: an empirical study in air travel choice. Transp Res Part A Policy and Practice 45:63–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2010.09.003

4. Boxall P, Adamowicz WL, Moon A (2009) Complexity in choice experiments: choice of the status quo alternative and implications for welfare measurement. Aust J Agric Resource Econ 53:503–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2009.00469.x

5. Boyle KJ, Özdemir S (2009) Convergent validity of attribute-based, choice questions in stated-preference studies. Environ Resource Econ 42:247–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9233-9

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Preferences for sexual health services among middle-aged and older adults in the UK: a discrete choice experiment;Sexually Transmitted Infections;2024-09-12

2. The EU Taxonomy in Action: Sustainable Finance Regulation and Investor Preferences;2024

3. Understanding pastoralists’ preferences for goat traits: Application of all-levels and end-point choice experiments;Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics;2023-06

4. Assessing Parental Preferences Regarding a Plant-Based Game for Educating Children about More Sustainable and Healthier Diets;Sustainability;2021-11-23

5. An economic-statistical design of simple linear profiles with multiple assignable causes using a combination of MOPSO and RSM;Soft Computing;2021-06-01