Author:
Wedel Marco,Ulbrich Hannah
Abstract
AbstractThere is a need for a scientific and theoretical foundation in the description of internal crowdsourcing systems with binding, consensus-based terminologies and descriptions. (How) Can the already described subcategories and aspects of an IC System be meaningfully described and placed in an orderly overall relationship? What needs to be added to existing system descriptions, if at all? The present article concentrates on identifying existing descriptions and definitions in connection with approaches to systematize the development of an internal crowdsourcing system (Some aspects of this article will also be published in German. Please be referred to: Daum, M.; Wedel, M.; Zinke-Wehlmann, C.; Ulbrich, H. (ed.) (2020): Gestaltung vernetzt-flexibler Arbeit. Beiträge aus Theorie und Praxis für die digitale Arbeitswelt. Berlin: Springer Vieweg). Since the phenomenon itself eludes allocation to an exclusively dedicated academic discipline, it seems appropriate to choose interdisciplinary approaches and to build on existing theoretical and terminological approaches from related sciences.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference54 articles.
1. Astor M, Rammer C, Klaus C, Klose G (2016) Innovativer Mittelstand 2025—Herausforderungen, Trends und Handlungsempfehlungen für Wirtschaft und Politik: Studie im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaft und Energie. https://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/DE/Publikationen/Studien/studie-endbericht-innovativer-mittelstand-2025.html. Accessed 3 Feb 2020
2. Bainbridge SM (2002) Director primacy: the means and ends of corporate governance. SSRN Electron J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.300860
3. Baxter G, Sommerville I (2011) Socio-technical systems: from design methods to systems engineering. Interact Comput 23(1):4–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.07.003
4. Beese J, Kazem H, Aier S (2015) On the conceptualization of information systems as socio-technical phenomena in simulation-based research. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/63ed/4e594c732636f2b52327efee89fd288b557e.pdf
5. Biermann F, Betsill MM, Burch S, Dryzek J, Gordon C, Gupta A, Gupta J, Inoue C, Kalfagianni A, Kanie N, Olsson L, Persson Å, Schroeder H, Scobie M (2019) The Earth System Governance Project as a network organization: a critical assessment after ten years. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 39:17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.04.004