Author:
Javornik Jana,Yerkes Mara A.
Abstract
AbstractComparative family policy research has advanced significantly in recent years. The growing availability of more and better data have improved our understanding of cross-national similarities and differences in family policies, as well as how they shape the lives of different families. Despite these advancements, comparative family policy research continues to face difficulties. The multifaceted nature of family policies makes cross-country comparisons complex. Conceptualizing our theoretical understanding of which policy aspects matter and why as well as operationalizing them into measurable indicators, often remains problematic for comparative analyses. Using examples of British and Swedish policies on childcare, a policy area particularly prone to conceptual challenges, we discuss the difficulties involved in conceptualizing family policies in comparative research. We argue that taking a capabilities approach provides a useful way forward in the field and show how such a conceptual framework allows us to more meaningfully analyze both work-family policies and their outcomes.
Funder
H2020 European Research Council
Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
University of Kent
Universität Hamburg
Stockholm University
Ghent Univeristy
University of Turku
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference98 articles.
1. Baxter, J. (2000). The joys and justice of housework. Sociology, 34(4), 609–631.
2. Béland, D. (2005). Ideas and social policy: An institutionalist perspective. Social Policy and Administration, 39(1), 1–18.
3. Béland, D. (2016). Ideas and institutions in social policy research. Social Policy & Administration, 50(6), 734–750.
4. Blackburn, P. (2012). Future directions for a mature UK childcare market. In E. Lloyd & H. Penn (Eds.), Childcare markets (pp. 43–60). Bristol: Policy Press.
5. Bonoli, G., & Reber, F. (2010). The political economy of childcare in OECD countries: Explaining cross-national variation in spending and coverage rates. European Journal of Political Research, 49(1), 97–118.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献