Abstract
AbstractNature-based health tourism is experiencing a resurgence. To determine its potential as a development opportunity for alpine destinations, it is necessary to analyse both the demand and supply side. Two surveys were conducted: a representative survey of the population of six countries of the Alpine Space exploring the perception of the Alps as a healthy destination in general and on the personal assessment of the health effect of natural resources in particular and an exploratory survey of tourism stakeholders in destination management, accommodation and gastronomy as well as (health) tourism services with a focus on the expected economic developments and the relevance of individual target groups for nature-based health tourism. The results demonstrate the need for a strategic development process which aligns perceptions with destination strategy and pre-existing offers. Two potential strategies are briefly outlined: 1. destinations with non-locally specific alpine natural health resources can develop broad tourism experiences for health conditions that occur across society with health a secondary aspect in marketing. 2. destinations featuring locally specific natural health resources with proven evidence can develop offers for a specific condition and are thus able to target a very specific group.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference14 articles.
1. C. Pichler, A. Hartl, R. Weißböck-Erdheim, M. Bischof, Medical evidence of Alpine natural resources as a base for health tourism. in Digital and Strategic Innovation for Alpine Health Tourism—Natural Resources, Digital Tools and Innovation Practices from HEALPS 2 Project, ed. by D. Spoladore, E. Pessot, M. Sacco (2022)
2. N. Lüdi, K. Frick, D. Bosshart, S. Kaiser, M. Hauser, M. Kühne, A. Egli, E. Banz, Unabhängige Studie des Gottlieb Duttweiler Instituts im Auftrag von Pro Natura. 68
3. Trendbüro and Kantar: Zukunftsstudie Living 2038, (2017)
4. P. Grahn, U.A. Stigsdotter, Landscape planning and stress. Urban For. Urban Greening. 2, 1–18 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1078/1618-8667-00019
5. F.S. Mayer, C.M. Frantz, E. Bruehlman-Senecal, K. Dolliver, Why is nature beneficial?: the role of connectedness to nature. Environ. Behav. 41, 607–643 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508319745