Experiences with Risk-Management and Remote Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil: Crises, Destitutions, and (Possible) Resolutions

Author:

Costin Claudia,Coutinho Allan

Abstract

AbstractThe chapter examines the difficult conditions under which states, and municipalities had to struggle to ensure learning continued during the social isolation demanded by the COVID-19 crisis in the country. Although it seemed reasonable to expect that the Federal government would respect the constitution and coordinate the educational response to the pandemic, that simply did not happen. The Minister of Education did not consider that such a responsibility should be carried out at the federal level. In the absence of leadership from the central government, the two organizations that congregate subnational secretaries decided to support their members and promote the exchange of practices, with some support from civil society organizations. Through the think tank established by the senior author of this chapter at a private university, CEIPE- Center for Excellence and Innovation in Education Policies, at the Getúlio Vargas Foundation, she participated in this effort, mentoring state and municipal level secretaries in their efforts to provide distance learning through a combination of media, such as TV, radio, and digital platforms. The chapter includes her own anecdotal observations of this national effort, drawing on interviews with secretaries and their teams as well as documents related to the experience as the evidence basis of the chapter. Unfortunately, this is not a story of triumph, since Brazil has been one of the countries with more months of schools being completely or partially closed. In addition to the ineffective approach to fighting the disease, which made Brazil’s rate of infection and deaths much worse than many countries in Latin America, the fact that mayoral elections coincided with COVID-19, introduced political reasons for schools to remain closed. The final part of the chapter draws lessons learned and discusses future possibilities for the future of education in Brazil.

Funder

Harvard Graduate School of Education

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference103 articles.

1. Abrucio, F. L., Seggatto, C. I., & Pereira, M. C. G. (2016). Regime de Colaboração no Ceará: Funcionamento, Causas Do Sucesso e Alternativas de Disseminação do Modelo Retrieved 26 December, 2020, from http://www.institutonatura.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Relatorio-Ceara-AF-Web.pdf.

2. Agostinelli, F., Doepke, M., Sorrenti, G., & Zilibotti, F. (2020). When the great equalizer shuts down: schools, peers, and parents in pandemic times (No. w28264; p. w28264). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w28264.

3. Akhtari, M., Moreira, D., & Trucco, L. (2014). Political turnover, bureaucratic turnover, and the quality of public services. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2538354

4. Alvarenga, F., & Parreira, M. (2020a). Comissão da Câmara faz relatório com críticas à atuação do Ministério da Educação durante a pandemia. G1. Retrieved from https://g1.globo.com/educacao/noticia/2020/06/17/comissao-da-camara-faz-relatorio-com-criticas-a-atuacao-do-ministerio-da-educacao-durante-a-pandemia.ghtml.

5. Alvarenga, F., & Parreira, M. (2020b). MEC possui “fragilidade” no planejamento e gestão, aponta relatório preliminar da Câmara. G1. Retrieved from https://g1.globo.com/educacao/noticia/2019/11/26/mec-possui-fragilidade-no-planejamento-e-gestao-aponta-relatorio-preliminar-da-camara.ghtml.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3