1. Anderson, E. E. (2019). A proposal for fair compensation for research participants. American Journal of Bioethics, 19(9), 62–64.
2. Anderson, E. E., & Spellecy, R. (2021). Patient and community engagement. In E. A. Banker, B. G. Gordon, E. A. Hurley, & S. P. Shriver (Eds.), Institutional review board management and function (3rd ed.). Jones and Bartlett Learning.
3. Castro-Reyes, P., Cooks, J., Drew, E., Edwards, K., Freeman, E., Isaacs, M.-L., Park, A., Sablan-Santos, L., Seifer, S. D., Shore, N., & Wat, E. (2015). Research ethics reconsidered in the context of community-engaged research: Proposed revisions to the Belmont report and Federal Regulations Guiding the protection of research participants. Campus-Community Partnerships for Health. Retrieved April 28, 2021 from https://ccphealth.org/2021/02/22/research-ethics-reconsidered-in-the-context-of-community-engaged-research-proposed-revisions-to-the-belmont-report-and-federal-regulations-guiding-the-protection-of-research-participants-2/
4. Cho, H. L., Danis, M., & Grady, C. (2018). Post-trial responsibilities beyond post-trial access. The Lancet, 391, 10129. Retrieved Sepetember 21, 2021 from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6010308/
5. Clinical and Translational Science Awards Consortium Community Engagement Key Function Committee Task Force on the Principles of Community Engagement (CTSA). (2011). Principles of Community Engagement. In Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (2nd ed.) Retrieved May 4, 2021 from https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/communityengagement/pce_what.html#figure1