The Realpolitik of Values-Based Practice: An Introduction to Part VI, Reflections

Author:

Fulford Bill

Abstract

AbstractThe three chapters in this Part reflect on their authors’ respective experiences of the challenges presented by the realpolitik of implementing projects in values-based practice. The challenges reflect the ‘3 Rs’ of values-based practice by which (as described in our concluding chapter 47, “Co-writing Values: What We Did and Why We Did It”) we have been guided in developing this book: Raising awareness, chapter 44, “Reflections on the Impact of Mental Health Ward Staff Training in Race Equality and Values-Based Practice”, a project combining race equality training and values-based practice for ward staff; Recognition, chapter 45, “Connecting Patients, Practitioners and Regulators in Supporting Positive Experiences and Processes of Shared Decision-Making in Osteopathy: A Case Study in Co-production”, a project in positive practice bringing together regulators, clinicians and patients; and Respect, chapter 46, “Beyond the Colour Bar: Sharing Narratives in Order to Promote a Clearer Understanding of Mental Health Issues Across Cultural and Racial Boundaries”, a project aimed at getting beyond the colour bar between white and black in mental health diagnosis. The chapter concludes with a note on the significance of the resources available from a culturally enriched form of values-based mental health practice for meeting the challenges of implementation.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference5 articles.

1. Weich S, McBride O, Twigg L, Keown P, Cyhlarova E, Crepaz-Keay D, Parsons H, Scott J, Bhui K. Variation in compulsory psychiatric inpatient admission in England: a cross-sectional, multilevel analysis. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2014;2(49):90.

2. Venkatapuram S. Values-based practice and global health. Chapter 11. In: Loughlin M, editor. Debates in values-based practice: arguments for and against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014.

3. Fulford KWM, Dewey S, King M. Values-based involuntary seclusion and treatment: value pluralism and the UK’s Mental Health Act 2007. Ch 60. In: Sadler JZ, van Staden W, Fulford KWM, editors. The Oxford handbook of psychiatric ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.

4. Fulford KWM, Duhig L, Hankin J, Hicks J, Keeble J. Values-based assessment in mental health: the 3 keys to a shared approach between service users and service providers. Ch 73. In: Sadler JZ, van Staden W, Fulford KWM, editors. The Oxford handbook of psychiatric ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.

5. Du Bois WD. The souls of the black folk. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1903.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3