Author:
Anceresi Giorgia,Provenzi Livio
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference70 articles.
1. Tronick E, Als H, Adamson L, Wise S, Brazelton TB. The infant’s response to entrapment between contradictory messages in face-toface interaction. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry. 1978;17:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-7138(09)62273-1.
2. Mesman J, van IJzendoorn MH, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ. The many face of the still-face paradigm: a review and meta-analysis. Dev Rev. 2009;30:120–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.02.001.
3. Miron D, Lewis ML, Zeanah CH. Clinical use of observational procedures in early childhood relationship assessment. Handb Infant Ment Health. 2009;1:252–65.
4. Giusti L, Provenzi L, Montirosso R. The Face-to-Face Still-Face (FFSF) Paradigm in Clinical Settings: Socio-Emotional Regulation Assessment and Parental Support With Infants With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities. Frontiers in psychology. 2018;9:789. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00789.
5. Gianino A, Tronick EZ. The mutual regulation model: the infant’s self and interactive regulation and coping and defensive capacities. In: Field TM, McCabe PM, Schneiderman N, editors. Stress and coping across development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988. p. 47–68.