Abstract
AbstractIn the flash lag effect (FLE), a moving object is seen to be ahead of a brief flash that is presented at the same spatial location; a haptic analogue of the FLE has also been observed [1, 2]. Some accounts of the FLE relate the effect to temporal delays in the processing of the stationary stimulus as compared to that of the moving stimulus [3–5]. We tested for movement-related processing effects in haptics. People judged the temporal order of two vibrotactile stimuli at the two hands: One hand was stationary, the other hand was executing a fast, medium, or slow hand movement. Stimuli at the moving hand had to be presented around 36 ms later, to be perceived to be simultaneous with stimuli at the stationary hand. In a control condition, where both hands were stationary, perceived simultaneity corresponded to physical simultaneity. We conclude that the processing of haptic stimuli at moving hands is accelerated as compared to stationary ones–in line with assumptions derived from the FLE.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference19 articles.
1. Nijhawan, R.: Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature 370, 256–257 (1994)
2. Cellini, C., Scocchia, L., Drewing, K.: The buzz-lag effect. Exp. Brain Res. 234(10), 2849–2857 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4687-4
3. Whitney, D., Murakami, I., Cavanagh, P.: Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli. Vis. Res. 40, 137–149 (2000)
4. Baldo, M.V., Klein, S.A.: Extrapolation or attention shift? Nature 378, 565–566 (1995)
5. Brenner, E., van Beers, E.R., Rotman, G., Smeets, J.B.: The role of uncertainty in the systematic spatial mislocalization of moving objects. J. Exp. Psychol.: HPP 32, 811–825 (2006)