Patent Linkages and Its Impact on Access to Medicines: Challenges, Opportunities for Developing Countries

Author:

Raju K. D.

Abstract

AbstractLinking patent protection to generics’ regulatory approvals is a heated topic of discussions and a friction point among countries proposing higher protection for patented drugs. Patent linkage has been pushed through bilateral and regional agreements outside of the WTO system. It is widely understood that patent linkage is implemented to delay the market entry of generic medicines. It is argued here that developing countries are not obliged to take up TRIPs plus patent-linkage obligations.A list of approved drugs and their therapeutic equivalence can be published by every country. The patent information can also be published to be made known to everybody. Regulatory mechanisms and patent protection should be kept in separate parallel tracks. Any attempt to link the two streams to prevent the registration of generics based solely on alleged patent infringement would negatively affect access to medicines worldwide.Patent linkage provisions are TRIPS-plus commitments, as there is no such obligation under the WTO TRIPS Agreement. The analysis of 16 countries which provide for patent linkage shows that it is, in most cases, a resulting commitment from regional trade agreements or bilateral agreements. Patent linkage provisions are not acceptable to the developing world, and any attempt to introduce these will affect the accessibility and affordability of generic medicines in the developing world.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference115 articles.

1. Abe T (2019) Japan: what impact do generic drugs have on the Japanese market? Managing IP Asia Pacific https://www.managingip.com/Article/3888280/Japan-What-impact-do-generic-drugs-have-on-the-Japanese-market.html. Accessed 8 Mar 2021

2. Aktiebolaget Hassle v. Alphapharm Pty Ltd, 212 CLR 411, para 101 2002

3. Aljurf S, Murray M (2018) Pharmaceutical IP and competition law in the United Arab Emirates: overview. https://content.next.westlaw.com/Document/I81997321b69811e698dc8b09b4f043e0/View/FullText.html?contextData=(sc.Default)&transitionType=Default. Accessed 8 Mar 2021

4. Anton Piller KG v. Manufacturing Processes Ltd., [1976] 1 All. E.R. 779, [1976] Ch. 55, [1976] 2 W.L.R. 162, [1975] EWCA Civ 12

5. Armouti W, Nsour M (2018) Data exclusivity for pharmaceuticals in free trade agreements: models in selected United States free trade agreements. http://www.hjil.org/wp-content/uploads/Nsour-FINAL.pdf. Accessed 8 Mar 2021

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3