Publisher
Springer Nature Switzerland
Reference35 articles.
1. Afrati, F.N., Kolaitis, P.G.: Repair checking in inconsistent databases: algorithms and complexity. In: Fagin, R. (ed.) Database Theory - ICDT 2009, 12th International Conference, Proceedings. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, St. Petersburg, Russia, 23–25 March 2009, vol. 361, pp. 31–41. ACM (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1514894.1514899
2. Arenas, M., Bertossi, L.E., Chomicki, J.: Scalar aggregation in FD-inconsistent databases. In: den Bussche, J.V., Vianu, V. (eds.) ICDT 2001. LNCS, vol. 1973, pp. 39–53. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44503-X_3
3. Arieli, O., Borg, A., Heyninck, J.: A review of the relations between logical argumentation and reasoning with maximal consistency. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 87(3), 187–226 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/S10472-019-09629-7
4. Arioua, A., Croitoru, M.: Dialectical characterization of consistent query explanation with existential rules. In: Markov, Z., Russell, I. (eds.) Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, FLAIRS 2016, Key Largo, Florida, USA, 16–18 May 2016, pp. 621–625. AAAI Press (2016). http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/FLAIRS/FLAIRS16/paper/view/12800
5. Arioua, A., Croitoru, M., Vesic, S.: Logic-based argumentation with existential rules. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 90, 76–106 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJAR.2017.07.004