Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference48 articles.
1. Aitken, C. (1995). Statistics and the evaluation of evidence for forensic scientists. Wiley.
2. Biedermann, A., Taroni, F., & Champod, C. (2012). How to assign a likelihood ratio in a footwear mark case: An analysis and discussion in the light of R v T. Law, Probability and Risk, 11(4), 259–277.
3. Bodziak, W. (2012). Traditional conclusions in footwear examinations versus the use of the Bayesian approach and likelihood ratio: A review of a recent UK appellate court decision. Law, Probability, and Risk, 11(4), 279–287.
4. Campaner, R., & Galavotti, M. C. (2007). Plurality in causality. In P. Machamer & G. Wolters (Eds.), Thinking about causes. From Greek philosophy to modern physics (pp. 178–199). University of Pittsburgh Press.
5. Campaner, R., & Galavotti, M. C. (2012). Evidence and the assessment of causal relations in the health sciences. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 26(1), 27–45.