Author:
Evola Marco,Krstić Ivana,Rabadán Fuensanta
Abstract
AbstractThe chapter discusses how the lack of gender knowledge and approach in judicial decision-making can influence the decision and the result of the case. Particular emphasis is given to the role of gender stereotypes and how gender stereotypes bias the working of the bench and the outcome courts achieve. Feminist judgments projects that have been developed worldwide demonstrate that judging is gendered, and women make a difference in the decision-making process. The rising number of women judges makes the bench more representative, although they face many constraints preventing them from asking the woman question. The analysis of the essential features of rewriting judgments in a gender perspective highlights that feminist judgments could contribute to the enhancement and spreading of gender competent legal knowledge.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference86 articles.
1. Aoláin FN (2015) More women – but which women? A reply to Stéphanie Hennette Vauchez. Eur J Int Law 26:229–236
2. Balkin JM (2002) What Brown v. Board of Education should have said: the nation’s top legal expert rewrite America’s landmark civil rights decision. New York University Press, New York
3. Balkin J (ed) (2005) What Roe v. Wade should have said: the nation’s top legal experts rewrite American’s most controversial decisions. New York University Press
4. Baroness Hale of Reachmond B (2008) A minority opinion? Proc Br Acad 154:319–336
5. Bartlett KT (1990) Feminist legal methods. Harv Law Rev 103:829–888