Abstract
AbstractBotany changed dramatically in the nineteenth century, particularly in German-speaking countries, and an important part of this change was the development of new methodological principles. Many botanists were deeply concerned with making observations accurate, experimental design meaningful, and inferences safe—in other words, they struggled to define “control strategies” and implement “control practices.” This essay specifically examines the work of Julius Wiesner (1838–1916), acclaimed plant physiologist in Vienna and protagonist of the new scientific botany. When Wiesner studied the influence of light on plants in his laboratory, he took care that all experimental circumstances were controlled meticulously; but the essay shows that when Wiesner moved his studies into the field, he had to adapt to entirely new conditions. The questions emerging from these studies ultimately demanded a different set of methodological principles and control strategies—so different the essay argues, that Wiesner helped to found a new sub-discipline: the “Biology of Plants”.
Publisher
Springer Nature Switzerland
Reference69 articles.
1. Allen, Garland. 1975. Life Sciences in the Twentieth Century. New York: Wiley.
2. Apelt, Ernst F. 1854. Die Theorie der Induction. Leipzig: Engelmann.
3. Arthur, Joseph C. 1895. Development of Vegetable Physiology. Science 2 (38): 360–373.
4. Bowler, Peter, and Iwan Rhys Morus. 2005. The New Biology. In Making Modern Science. A Historical Survey, 165–188. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Buchdahl, Gerd. 1973. Leading Principles and Induction: The Methodology of Matthias Schleiden. In Foundations of Scientific Method: The Nineteenth Century, ed. Ronald N. Giere and Richard S. Westfall, 23–52. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.