Author:
Steiner-Khamsi Gita,Baek Chanwoong,Karseth Berit,Nordin Andreas
Abstract
AbstractThis chapter focuses on government-appointed advisory commissions in Norway and Sweden and investigates how and to what extent their respective governments use the evidence produced in these commissions for education policymaking. Drawing on the concepts of network governance and multi-centric policymaking, it compares reference patterns (a) between Green Papers (GPs) and White Papers (WPs) and (b) between Norwegian and Swedish GPs. The results show that the WPs produced by the ministries share strikingly few references with the GPs produced by their appointed commissions. An in-depth analysis of the references which “made” it to the political level demonstrates how knowledge gets lost, rebalanced, or reinterpreted in the policy process. This chapter situates the findings within discussions on the changing role of advisory commissions in today’s policymaking.
Funder
Norwegian Research Council
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference64 articles.
1. Baek, C. (2020). Knowledge utilization in education policymaking in the United States, South Korea, and Norway: A bibliometric network analysis (Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University).
2. Ball, S. J., & Junemann, C. (2012). Networks, new governance and education. University of Bristol and Policy Press.
3. Boswell, C. (2017). The role of expert knowledge in international organizations. In A. Littoz-Monnet (Ed.), The politics of expertise in International Organizations: How International bureaucracies produce and mobilize knowledge (pp. 19–36). Routledge.
4. Boswell, C. (2018). Manufacturing political trust: Targets and performance measurement in public policy. Cambridge University Press.
5. Cairney, P., Heikkila, T., & Wood, M. (2019). Making policy in a complex world. Cambridge University Press.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献