Abstract
AbstractCompanies operating high-hazard installations in the process industry call upon consultants to provide safety-related expertise. They do so voluntarily but also in specific regulatory contexts which require operating companies to assess risks and establish a safety case, a structured evidence-based demonstration that the facility will not generate unacceptable risks for society. Consulting companies have different strategies and compete to gain access to contracts, which are selected according to criteria such as costs, technical propositions, trust or reputation. This creates a specific market. National regulators play a key role in setting the level of expectation regarding safety cases, by among other things, requiring the use of a third-party expert. These preliminary outcomes show the importance of situating and understanding the contribution of these private actors in process safety regulation and governance as another facet of subcontracting in relation to safety.
Publisher
Springer Nature Switzerland
Reference7 articles.
1. K.W. Abbott, D. Levi-Faur, D. Snidal, Theorizing regulatory intermediaries: The RIT model. Ann. Am. Acad. Pol. Soc. Sci. 670(1), 14–35 (2017)
2. P.H. Lindøe, M. Baram, O. Renn (eds.), Risk Governance of Offshore Oil and Gas Operations (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2013)
3. V. McDermott, J. Hayes, Risk shifting and disorganization in multi-tier contracting chains: The implications for public safety. Saf. Sci. 106, 263–272 (2019)
4. D. Owen, Private facilitators of public regulation: A study of the environmental consulting industry. Regulation Gov. 15(1), 226–242 (2021)
5. M.A. Sujan, I. Hablib, T.P. Kelly, C. Johnson, Should healthcare providers do safety cases? Lessons from a cross-industry review of safety case practices. Safety Sci. 84, 181–189 (2016)