Subjectification, Technology, and Rationality – Sustainable Transformation of the Mobility Sector from a Governmentality Perspective

Author:

Hansel Julia,Graf Antonia

Abstract

AbstractShared mobility services play an essential role in a sustainable mobility transition and unfold among so-called smart technologies. Although this can positively affect mobility, it also poses challenges for the development of sustainable urban mobility, for example, because the smart options are not equally available to all people or are inaccessible. Issues of social or ecological inequality as well as the digital exclusion of people in the mobility sector are increasingly becoming the focus of attention. Largely unexplored in this context is how the subjects of shared mobility services will be conceived, and what knowledge, skills, and resources they should bring to use smart and shared mobility services in the future. We contribute to closing this research gap by investigating the rationalities that sustainable smart and shared mobility transformation follow, which developments are triggered by the technologies, and in which ways identification offers address subjects. Foucault’s concept of governmentality is used as a theoretical perspective and nuanced with critical (feminist) literature on identity formation. Methodologically, this article works with qualitative content analysis of policy documents and an ethnographically oriented observation of registration conditions in various car-, bike-, electronic moped, and scooter-sharing services. The results show that subjects are addressed in a rather general way, and their (special) needs are hardly considered. Instead, they are addressed as flexible citizen-consumers and correspond with the rationality of (green) economic growth and the liberal paradigm. Accordingly, the technologies aim for innovation, fair competition, and the provision of public space by the state.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference63 articles.

1. Althusser, L.: Ideologie und ideologische Staatsapparate: Aufsätze zur marxistischen Theorie. Hamburg (1977)

2. Banister, D.: The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transp. Policy 15, 73–80 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005

3. Berlin. Stadtentwicklungsplan Mobilität und Verkehr Berlin 2030 (2021). https://www.berlin.de/sen/uvk/verkehr/verkehrspolitik/stadtentwicklungsplan-mobilitaet-und-verkehr/. Accessed 29 June 2022

4. Bonham, J.: Transport: disciplining the body that travels. In: Paterson, M., Boehm, S. (eds.) Against Automobility, pp. 57–74. Hoboken, NJ, Oxford (2006)

5. Butler, J.: Das Unbehagen der Geschlechter, 5th edn. Frankfurt am Main (1995)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3