Analysing the Conceptualisation of Remedial Actions Towards the “Migration Crisis” at the EU Level

Author:

Stępka Maciej

Abstract

AbstractThe chapter is concerned with the conceptualisation of remedial actions, which have been deployed in response to the “migration crisis”. It discusses how the EU frame-narrative has shifted in favour of risk, resilience, and “exceptionality”, leaving human security dispersed among different types of policy actions. With this in mind, the chapter discusses at length the framing and development of specific policy instruments such as the so-called “EU-Turkey deal”, dataveillance systems, the “hot-spot approach”, or reform of Frontex and Europol, to name a few. It also discusses the emergence of resilience as an important security logic. In this respect, it analyses how this relatively new security narrative has heavily influenced EU security and policy discourse on migration and migrants, calling for increased administrative resilience of the EU asylum system, or border security system, to name a few. Further, the chapter discusses how risk management, resilience, “exceptionality” and human security have been intertwining in policy responses to terrorism, trans-border organised crime, as well as in the utilisation of EU military means in increasing resilience outside EU borders. In this respect, it looks into EUFOR “Sophia”, Frontex Joint Operations and EU capacity building and border assistance missions, discussing their securitising features.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference237 articles.

1. Alberto, J., & Tebas, M. (2015). EU-SAHEL. Regional action plan (2015–2020): A tangible holistic approach. IEEE.ES Analysis Report. 50/2015. Retrieved January 10, 2021 from https://www.ieee.es/en/Galerias/fichero/docs_analisis/2015/DIEEEA50-2015_UE-Sahel__JAMT_ENGLISH.pdf

2. Amicelle, A., Aradau, C., & Jeandesboz, J. (2015). Questioning security devices: Performativity, resistance, politics. Security Dialogue, 46(4), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010615586964

3. Amnesty International Website. (2016). Turkey: Illegal mass returns of Syrian refugees expose fatal flaws in EU-Turkey statement. Retrieved January 13, 2021, from https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2016/04/turkey-illegal-mass-returns-of-syrian-refugees-expose-fatal-flaws-in-eu-turkey-deal/.ą

4. Amoore, L., & Raley, R. (2017). Securing with algorithms: Knowledge, decision, sovereignty. Security Dialogue, 48(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010616680753

5. Baldaccini, A. (2009). The EU directive on return: Principles and protests. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 28(4), 114–138. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdq002

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3