Abstract
AbstractThe World Heritage Convention combines efforts of heritage protection and conservation on the global, national and local level. It has been adopted by almost 200 countries and has a complex governance system with actors on every level. While these actors are critical to the protection and conservation of World Heritage Sites, very limited research is available that assesses their role and the importance of governmental and managerial structures on a holistic level. This study assesses different governance structures and illustrates how they influence protective efforts. The World Heritage Site Index, which is a comprehensive database of information from almost 900 World Heritage Sites, creates a unique perspective that allows for the comparative assessment of sites regardless of their designation or typology. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, the study reveals clear governance structures that influence the protection of World Heritage Sites and offers a perspective on potential steps toward ensuring that these structures work for and not against the protection and conservation of these sites.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference15 articles.
1. Albert, M.-T. (2012). Perspectives of World Heritage: Towards future-oriented strategies with the five ‘Cs’. In M.-T. Albert, M. Richon, M. J. Viñals, & A. Witcomb (Eds.), Community development through World Heritage (pp. 32–38). World Heritage Centre, UNESCO.
2. Bertacchini, E., Saccone, D., & Santagata, W. (2011). Embracing diversity, correcting inequalities: Towards a new global governance for the UNESCO World Heritage. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 17(3), 278–288.
3. Bonini Baraldi, S., & Ferri, P. (2019). From communism to market: Business models and governance in heritage conservation in Poland. Journal of Management and Governance, 23(3), 787–812.
4. James, L., & Winter, T. (2017). Expertise and the making of World Heritage policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 23(1), 36–51.
5. Labadi, S. (2007). Representations of the nation and cultural diversity in discourses on World Heritage. Journal of Social Archaeology, 7(2), 147–170.