Respecting the Right to Nationality in International Sport

Author:

Worster William Thomas

Abstract

AbstractInternational sports pledge to eradicate discriminatory practices, yet paradoxically continue to support discrimination on the grounds of nationality. Athletes compete as part of a national team. This requires sporting associations and the International Olympic Committee (IOC) to make distinctions among athletes merely on the grounds of nationality. The Olympic Charter does this. Because of this need to make nationality distinctions, those associations must also develop nationality rules. These rules force choices of nationality and place restrictions on the ability to compete for the new national team. When athletes wish to change nationality, they risk falling into a nationality limbo, where they cannot compete, for lack of a sports nationality.In contrast to international sporting rules and the Olympic Charter, international human rights law takes a different approach to nationality as a human right. Every individual has a right to a nationality. This nationality is often the source of other rights, such as political participation, employment and education. In addition, this right includes the right to change nationality. However, the IOC limits recognizing nationality changes. The result is that athletes who do not satisfy nationality rules can be deemed de facto stateless for sport, even though the creation of statelessness is largely prohibited. For these reasons, IOC rules on change of nationality do not live up to the Committee’s own human rights aspirations and the Olympic Charter must be amended to respect the rights to nationality.

Publisher

Springer Nature Switzerland

Reference20 articles.

1. Baker K, Tracy J (2022) Team China’s foreign-born Olympians. Axios, 17 February 2022. https://www.axios.com/2022/02/17/team-china-olympic-import-athletes

2. Brownlie I (2008) Principles of international law

3. Chetail V (2019) International migration law

4. Kochenov D (2010) Citizenship without respect: the EU’s troubled equality ideal. Jean Monnet paper no. 8/10

5. Kochenov D (2012) Two sovereign states vs. a human being: ECJ as a guardian of arbitrariness in citizenship matters. In: Talani LS (ed) Globalisation, migration, and the future of Europe

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3