Sanctorius’s Work in Its Practical Context

Author:

Hollerbach Teresa

Abstract

AbstractThis chapter spotlights the practical context of theDe statica medicinaand explores Sanctorius’s use of instrumentation. The investigation of the form and style of theDe statica medicinaand its relation to the literary genre ofRegimina sanitatis—a medieval tradition of rules of health—allows important conclusions to be drawn on how Sanctorius shared his practical experiences, on his intended audience, and more generally, on the purpose of the publication. Complementary to established knowledge on Sanctorius, the analysis of his use of instrumentation focuses here not on the measuring instruments, but on the various other lesser-known devices that he developed, ranging from surgical devices to a special sickbed. I examine the relation of these devices to Sanctorius’s medical practice as well as to his teaching activities at the University of Padua. Even though—or exactly because—they were not part of the quantitative approach to physiology, their study helps to complement the picture of Sanctorius as a practicing physician. Moreover, it provides glimpses of the social context in which he developed and used his instruments and of how he used his head and hands in medicine. Finally, the results of this chapter allow theDe statica medicinato be reviewed afresh within the broader practical context of Sanctorius’s undertakings.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference78 articles.

1. Albala, Ken. 2002. Eating Right in the Renaissance. Oakland CA: University of California Press.

2. Arano, Luisa Cogliati. 1976. The Medieval Health Handbook: Tacuinum Sanitatis. New York: George Braziller.

3. ASVe-a: Provveditori e Sopraprovveditori alla Sanità, Busta 562, Giudizi sulla peste.

4. ASVe-g: Sezione Notarile Testamenti (Testamenti Crivelli), Busta 289, n. 537.

5. Baker, Tawrin. 2015. Colour in Three Seventeenth-Century Scholastic Textbooks. In Colour Histories: Science, Art and Technology in the 17th and 18th Centuries, ed. Magdalena Bushart and Friedrich Steinle, 161–177. Berlin: De Gruyter.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3