Quantification and Certainty

Author:

Hollerbach Teresa

Abstract

AbstractIn this chapter, I examine the context in which Sanctorius presented his measuring instruments in his publications. In difference to previous studies, which often have focused solely on the Commentary on Avicenna, this being the only work in which Sanctorius included illustrations of his instruments, I analyze the measuring instruments in the light of all that Sanctorius published. Furthermore, I scrutinize the relation of the various instruments to each other and discuss Sanctorius’s possible complementary use of them. Of particular interest in this context is the role of the De statica medicina, which has become a keyword for Sanctorius’s quantitative approach to physiology. These considerations will serve as an introduction to an in-depth study of Sanctorius’s measuring instruments in Chap. 7, and reveal the agenda behind his quantification efforts—to enhance certainty in medicine. Given that the degree of conjecture in medicine was a contested issue in traditional introductory discussions in contemporary works on medicine, I examine Sanctorius’s claim to enhance certainty through quantification, measurements, and instruments against the backdrop of the prevailing discourse(s) therein. While it is immediately obvious that Sanctorius departed from traditional views by introducing new quantitative procedures into medicine, the investigation of the roles that he assigned to logical reasoning, on the one hand, and to experience, empirical knowledge, and his new methods of quantification, on the other, draws a more complex picture regarding the combination of theory and practice in his works.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference46 articles.

1. Bigotti, Fabrizio. 2016. Mathematica Medica. Santorio and the Quest for Certainty in Medicine. Journal of Healthcare Communications 1: 1–8.

2. ———. 2018. The Weight of the Air: Santorio’s Thermometers and the Early History of Medical Quantification Reconsidered. Journal of Early Modern Studies 7: 73–103.

3. Bigotti, Fabrizio, and David Taylor. 2017. The Pulsilogium of Santorio: New Light on Technology and Measurement in Early Modern Medicine. Society and Politics 11: 55–114.

4. Castellani, Carlo. 1958. Alcune lettere di Santorio Santorio a Senatore Settala. Castalia 1: 3–7.

5. De Pace, Anna. 1993. Le matematiche e il mondo: Ricerche su un dibattito in Italia nella seconda metà del Cinquecento. Milan: Franco Angeli.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3