Author:
Rodríguez-Merchán E. Carlos,Encinas-Ullán Carlos A.,Ruiz-Pérez Juan S.,Gómez-Cardero Primitivo
Publisher
Springer Nature Switzerland
Reference20 articles.
1. Bailey O, Ferguson K, Crawfurd E, James P, May PA, Brown S, et al. No clinical difference between fixed- and mobile-bearing cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23:1653–9.
2. Hofstede SN, Nouta KA, Jacobs W, van Hooff ML, Wymenga AB, Pijls BG, et al. Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty for postoperative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2:CD003130.
3. Killen CJ, Murphy MP, Hopkinson WJ, Harrington MA, Adams WH, Rees HW. Minimum twelve-year follow-up of fixed- vs mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: Double blinded randomized trial. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;11:154–9.
4. Sappey-Marinier E, de Abreu FGA, O'Loughlin P, Gaillard R, Neyret P, Lustig S, et al. No difference in patellar position between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty for medial osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28:1542–50.
5. Woolson ST, Northrop GD. Mobile- vs. fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a clinical and radiologic study. J Arthroplast. 2004;19:135–40.