Abstract
AbstractThis chapter considers the work of the OSCE Permanent Council as the OSCE’s central body for decision-making and diplomatic interaction. It is particularly interested in the types of alliance behaviour present and how this affects the OSCE’s ability to perform its duties successfully. The chapter highlights the prevalence of collective activity by the EU’s member states and numerous regular partners, and the near absence of organized collective activity by other groups of states. It then discusses how these existing cooperation patterns hamper the OSCE’s ability to successfully mediate conflicts such as that between Russia and Ukraine.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference41 articles.
1. Åtland, K. (2020). Destined for deadlock? Russia, Ukraine, and the unfulfilled Minsk agreements. Post-Soviet Affairs, 36(2), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2020.1720443
2. Aydın-Düzgit, S., Bond, I., & Scazzieri, L. (2021). The role of differentiation in EU foreign, security and defence policy cooperation with neighbouring countries. EU IDEA.
3. Börzel, T. A., & Peters, I. (2019). ‘It’s politics, stupid’: An international relations perspective on strengthening the legal framework of the OSCE. In M. Steinbrück Platise, C. Moser, & A. Peters (Eds.), The legal framework of the OSCE (pp. 95–118). Cambridge University Press.
4. Brill. https://brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789004336346/B9789004336346_010.xml. Accessed 20 October 2021.
5. Chepurina, M. (2017). Migration crisis in the OSCE area: Action lines form the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly. In Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy Hamburg (Ed.), OSCE yearbook 2016 (pp. 249–258). Nomos.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献