Ethics Versus the Law: The Case of the Belfast Project

Author:

Kara Helen

Abstract

AbstractThis chapter offers a case study of the Belfast Project archive, set up by Boston College in the US to hold accounts of the conflict in Northern Ireland known as ‘the Troubles’. People who provided information were given written guarantees that their own accounts, and indeed the Project itself, would be kept secret until after their deaths. However, the existence of the Project was made public by its own director while some participants were still alive. The chapter begins with a brief background to the Troubles and an explanation of the importance of archives. Then the history of the archive is outlined and analysed, and the lessons learned from the case are discussed. One key lesson is that unless or until there is legal recognition of researcher-participant privilege, it will not always be possible for research data to be kept secure both ethically and legally. In conclusion, we outline the potential role for archival evidence in policymaking, and provide evidence for the importance of trust in social co-operation. We point to ways in which policy can help to build and maintain this trust and so help to forestall and manage conflict.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference31 articles.

1. Adams, Katherine. 2014. The tension between research ethics and legal ethics: Using journalist’s privilege state statutes as model for proposed researcher’s privilege. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 27 (3): 335–358.

2. Bache, Ian. 2019. How does evidence matter? Understanding ‘what works’ for wellbeing. Social Indicators Research 142: 1153–1173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1941-0.

3. BBC. 2019. Boston tapes: Q&A on secret Troubles confessions. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-27238797. Accessed 7 Sep 2021.

4. Belfast Project Agreement. 2001. http://bostoncollegesubpoena.wordpress.com/exhibits/respondent-moloney-agreement/. Accessed 22 Jun 2021.

5. Breen-Smyth, Marie. 2019. Interviewing combatants: Lessons from the Boston College Case. Contemporary Social Science 15 (2): 258–274.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3