1. Ackermann, F. (2018). Territorialisation and incarceration: The nexus between solitary confinement, Religious Praxis and imperial rule in nineteenth-century Poland and Lithuania. Acta Poloniae Historica, 118, 5–37.
2. Averkieva, K. V. (2014). Geograficheskoe polozhenie kak factor raznoobraziya tyurem’noi ekonomiki [Geography as a factor in the variation of the prison economy]. In S. S Artoboloveskii & V. N. Streletskii (Eds.), Raznoobrazie kak factor i uslovie territorial’nogo razvitiya, ChIM (pp. 254–269): Eslan.
3. Averkieva, K. V. (2015). Territorial’naya organisatsiya ispravitel’nykh uchrezhdenii Rossii [Territorial organisation of penal facilities in Russia]. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk, Seriya Geograficheskaya, 3, 19–34.
4. Azarkhin, A. V., & Useev, R. Z. (2017). Arkhitekturnaya tipologiya i fortifikatsiya mest ispolneniya i otbyvaniya otdel’nykh vidov nakasanii i mer presecheniya v obespechenii bezopasnosti UIS [Architectural typology and fortification of different penal facilities and measaure to secure the safety in the correctional system]. Yuridicheskaya naukaiI Praktik: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi AkaDemii MVD Rossiya, 2(38), 52–57.
5. Baker, E. (2013). The emerging role of the EU as a penal actor. In T. Daems, D. Van Zyl Smit, & S. Snacken (Eds.), European penology? (pp. 77–112). Hart.