Abstract
AbstractThis chapter focuses on some socio-spatial views by Nordic geographers who have studied the tendencies of politicisation vs. depoliticisation of human/nature relationships. First, I introduce early formulations of politics of nature research by showing the epistemological grounding and argumentation for the political in Nordic nature studies. This is followed by an overview of studies that have focused on depoliticising drives and turns in contemporary human/nature practices. The variations in handling and conceptualising the dominating aspects of neoliberal environmental governance will be described. Thereafter, I address some approaches of research within Nordic geography that are entangled in the processes and actors defending and promoting a (re)politicisation in nature-use. Finally, I discuss the Nordic content and bearing found in the geographical contributions included in this study.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference116 articles.
1. Ahlqvist, T., & Sirviö, H. (2020). Contradictions of spatial governance. Antipode, 51(2), 395–418.
2. Alhojärvi, T. (2021). For postcapitalist studies: Inheriting futures of space and economy. Nordia, 50(2), 1–230.
3. Andersson, J., & Westholm, E. (2019). Closing the future: Environmental research and the management of conflicting future value orders. Science, Technology & Human Values, 44(2), 237–262.
4. Anshelm, J., & Haikola, S. (2018). Depoliticisation, repoliticisation, and environmental concerns. ACME, 17(2), 561–596.
5. Anshelm, J., Haikola, S., & Wallsten, B. (2018). Politicizing environmental governance. Geoforum, 91, 206–215.