Abstract
AbstractNumerous challenges confront the task of evaluating sustainable development—its complex nature, complementary evaluation criteria, and the difficulty of evaluation at the nexus of human and natural systems. Theory-based evaluation, drawn from critical realism, is well suited to this task. When constructing a program theory/theory of change for evaluating sustainable development, concepts of socioecological systems and coupled human and natural systems are useful. The chapter discusses four modes of inference and the application of different theory-based evaluation approaches. It introduces the CHANS (coupled human and natural systems) framework, a holistic, analytical framework that is useful in evaluating such complex, social-ecological systems and resonates with the challenging elements of sustainable development evaluation.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference67 articles.
1. Alkin, M. C. (2013). Evaluation roots: A wider perspective of theorists’ views and influences (2nd ed.). Sage.
2. Allen, T. (2008). Scale and type: A requirement for addressing complexity with dynamical quality. In D. Waltner-Toews, J. J. Kay, & N.-M. E. Lister (Eds.), The ecosystem approach: Complexity, uncertainty, and managing for sustainability (pp. 37–49). Columbia University.
3. Bhaskar, R. (2013). A realist theory of science. Routledge.
4. Bhaskar, R., Frank, C., Parker, J., & Høyer, K. G. (2010). Interdisciplinarity and climate change: Transforming knowledge and practice for our global future. Taylor & Francis.
5. Bickman, L. (1987). Using program theory in evaluation. Jossey-Bass.