“Selecting by Origin” Revisited: On the Particularistic Turn of German Labour Migration Policy

Author:

Schneider Jan,Kolb Holger

Abstract

AbstractFollowing a decade in which German labour migration policy has developed towards a universalistic regime that applied similar conditions towards most third country nationals applying for admission, we observe a slow but steady return of ethnic selectivity and particularistic features in this area. Although human capital remains a centrepiece of the bundle of regulations and institutional settings which govern the process of selecting labour migrants, the factor of the respective country of origin of applicants has regained importance over the last few years. This Chapter explores a number of deviations from a legal framework, which in principle is universalist and claims to put merits, certificates and employers’ demand first. We demonstrate, however, that starting conditions for obtaining a work visa turn out to be unequal, as they positively discriminate particular nationalities. This prominence of ethnic origin in migrant admission policies vis-à-vis third countries is a rather recent phenomenon in Germany, but something which could be observed in other EU countries – not least in Southern EU Member States – already for some years. These observations tend to counter the proverbial North-South divide, suggesting rather unexpected policy convergences within the EU.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference41 articles.

1. Arango, J., et al. (2009). The making of an immigration model: Inflows, impacts and policies in southern Europe. IDEA working papers 9. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.460.5752&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 1 July 2021.

2. Beirens, H., Le Coz, C., Hooper, K., Popp, K., Schneider, J., & Süß, J. (2019). Legal migration for work and training: Mobility options to Europe for those not in need of protection. SVR. https://www.svr-migration.de/en/publications/mobility_options_to_europe/. Accessed 28 June 2021.

3. Bither, J., & Ziebarth, A. (2018). Creating legal pathways to reduce irregular migration? What we can learn from Germany’s “Western Balkan ruling”. German Marshall Fund of the United States. https://www.gmfus.org/news/creating-legal-pathways-reduce-irregular-migration-what-we-can-learn-germanys-western-balkan. Accessed 1 July 2021.

4. Boucher, A., & Gest, J. (2015). Migration studies at a crossroads: A critique of immigration regime typologies. Migration Studies, 3(2), 182–198. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnu035

5. Cerna, L. (2013). Understanding the diversity of EU migration policy in practice: The implementation of the blue card initiative. Policy Studies, 34(2), 180–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2013.767587

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3