Challenges and Ambiguities of the Policies for Immigrants’ Regularisation: The Portuguese Case in Context

Author:

Malheiros Jorge,Peixoto João

Abstract

AbstractThe idea that most immigrant receiving countries face a crisis of control has become pervasive since the 1990s, when neoliberal globalisation, as well as securitarian and nationalist policies, gained space. Due to the several contradictions and inefficiencies of the global circulation framework, most countries are exposed to uncontrolled migration, including the North and South European ones. The challenge is stronger when borders separate regions with uneven development levels and the economic cycle is expanding. When irregular migration occurs, the basic ex-post policy choices are limited to ignore the problem, enact deportation strategies or create mechanisms for regularisation.In Southern European countries, irregular immigration became endemic. Until the mid-2000s, the most frequent policy approach adopted in these migration regimes was the enactment of extraordinary regularisation processes. Since then, some nations adopted an ongoing regularisation model. Using Portugal as a reference, we intend to examine how such processes were implemented and why they have been enacted. Because the features of the Portuguese case share elements with other countries, some comparative analysis is developed and positioned at the global European level, to evaluate the convergence or divergence hypothesis and the blurring of migration regimes’ boundaries.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference40 articles.

1. Acosta Arcarazo, D. (2013). Estudo comparativo das legislações sobre a imigração de Portugal, Espanha e Brasil. In C. Finotelli, D. Acosta, D. M. Fernandes, J. Peixoto, L. Belchior, M. da Consolação Gomes de Castro, S. P. Knup, & T. F. da Silva (Eds.), Migração Brasil – Europa: A situação dos migrantes brasileiros na Espanha e Portugal e de portugueses e espanhóis no Brasil: aspectos legais e vivências (pp. 48–134). International Centre for Migration Policy Development (ICMPD).

2. Arango, J. (2012). Early starters and latecomers. Comparing countries of immigration and immigration regimes in Europe. In M. Okólski (Ed.), European immigrations. Trends, structures and policy implications (pp. 45–64). Amsterdam University Press.

3. Baganha, M. I. (2005). Política de imigração: a regulação dos fluxos. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 73, 29–44.

4. Baganha, M. I., & Peixoto, J. (1997). Trends in the 90’s: The Portuguese migratory experience. In M. I. Baganha (Ed.), Immigration in southern Europe (pp. 15–40). Celta.

5. Baldwin-Edwards, M. (2012). The southern European model of immigration: A sceptical view. In M. Okólski (Ed.), European immigrations. Trends, structures and policy implications (pp. 149–158). Amsterdam University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3