External Controls: Policing Entries, Enforcing Exits

Author:

Landini Irene,Sciortino Giuseppe

Abstract

AbstractIn this chapter, we provide an empirical critique of the conceptual frame of debates on convergence and divergence among EU states regarding migration policies. The key assumption underlying such debates is that EU states are essentially independent units, with their own admission and control challenges. We suggest, on the contrary, that migration control policies in Western European states should be considered as an interdependent, yet politically segmented, system.We test this view by analysing two migration policy fields widely different in terms of history and development, i.e., visa and return policy. With regard to visa policies, the systematic configuration emerges clearly. We show that, over time, the original Northern model of visa controls has become the widely accepted normative model across all European states today, formalised in the New Common Visa Code. Existing differences between North and South Europe have to be read in light of this generally homogenous background. On the contrary, policy harmonization and cooperation in return policies and practices have always remained low. We do not observe, however, evidence of a North-South cleavage. Interestingly, a process that we could define as “converge” is at play, since all EU states have shown to be largely ineffective in removing unauthorised TCNs from their territories.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference57 articles.

1. Baldwin-Edwards, M. (1999). Where free markets reign: Aliens in the twilight zone. In J. Arango & M. Baldwin-Edwards (Eds.), Immigrants and the informal economy in southern Europe (pp. 1–15). Routledge.

2. Baldwin-Edwards, M. (2001). Semi-reluctant hosts: Southern Europe’s ambivalent response to immigration. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 8(2), 211–229.

3. Bernard, S. (2019). Oil shocks, migration and European integration: A (trans)national perspective on the Yugoslav crises of the 1980s. National Identities, 21(5), 463–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2018.1498471

4. Bommes, M. (2012). In C. Bosswell & G. D’Amato (Eds.), Immigration and social systems: Collected essays of Michael Bommes. Amsterdam University Press.

5. Bourdieu, P. (1997). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3