Concluding Remarks: Towards a New Conceptualisation of Similarities and Differences in European Migration Controls

Author:

Finotelli Claudia,Ponzo Irene

Abstract

AbstractThe main objective of this book has been to understand migration controls beyond national models and dichotomies that juxtapose “efficient” versus “inefficient” state policies. Specifically, this volume contributes to dispute some consolidated ideas about using the North-South divide as the main lens to interpret how European countries respond to common imperatives of control on the entry and residence of immigrants. In doing so, we argue that migration control policies and their results can be conceived of as a product of overlapping processes of convergence and divergence, driven by changing external contexts, different geopolitical and economic interests, and varying national constraints, all of which are engaged by a wide range of social actors.In the first part of this chapter, we focus on convergence dynamics by illustrating the increasing similarities between Northern and Southern European countries. Then, we point out some key drivers of this convergence. Drawing on previous chapters, we find this convergence appears mainly related to shifts in external constraints in the form of increasingly similar migration inflows and Europeanisation processes.The second part of the chapter focuses on divergence, addressing the relevance of nation-states’ geopolitical and economic interests in the European migration system and their institutional and structural constraints as crucial determinants of the logics and practices of migration control.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference48 articles.

1. Alt, J. (2003). Leben in der Schattenwelt. Problemkomplex “illegaler” migration. Von Loeper.

2. Andersson, R. (2014). Illegality, Inc: Clandestine migration and the business of bordering Europe. University of California Press.

3. Baldwin-Edwards, M., & Kraler, A. (Eds.). (2009). REGINE regularisations in Europe. Study on practices in the area of regularisation of illegally staying third-country nationals in the member states of the EU. ICMPD.

4. Benton, M., & Selee, A. (2022). The Ukrainian conflict could be a tipping point for refugee protection. Commentaries, Migration Policy Institute. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/news/ukrainian-displacement-refugee-protection

5. Bommes, M., & Thränhardt, D. (2010). Introduction: National paradigms of migration research. In M. Bommes & D. Thränhardt (Eds.), National Paradigms of Migration Research. (pp. 9–38). V+R Uni-Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3