Abstract
AbstractIn this chapter the many ways in which the individual-society relationship has been approached in the history of sociology are addressed. The micro-macro distinction is discussed as an early conceptualisation of this relationship. In Thomas and Znaniecki’s pioneering work they made a distinction between ‘values’ and ‘attitudes’ that was considered an early attempt at constructing notions to discuss this issue in biographical research. The prominence of the agency-structure pair of concepts since the 1990s in the vocabulary to discuss the relationship between individuals and society is discussed in relation to the historical contexts of their origin. The section outlines arguments from some of the prominent sociologists who have written about the topic. Gendered aspects of concepts are seldom addressed in mainstream sociological theoretical discussions. A section that discusses this topic in its own right is included in this chapter. It sets notions of gendered agency within the historical contexts of debates that addressed them. Differences between the structure-agency divide on the one hand, and the history-biography dynamic on the other are discussed in the fourth section of the chapter. It also gives an overview of the diversity of approaches to the history-biography dynamic in biographical life course research.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference34 articles.
1. Abbott, Andrew. 1997. Of Time and Space: The Contemporary Relevance of the Chicago School. Social Forces 75 (4): 1149–1182.
2. Alexander, Jeffrey, and Bernhard Giesen. 1987. From Reduction to Linkage: The Long View of the Micro-Macro Debate. In The Micro-Macro Link, ed. J. Alexander, B. Giesen, R. Münch, and N. Smelser, 1–44. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3. Alwin, Duane. 1995. Taking Time Seriously: Studying Social Change, Social Structure, and Human Lives. In Examining Lives in Context: Perspectives on the Ecology of Human Development, ed. P. Moen, G. Elder, and K. Lüscher, 211–262. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
4. Archer, Margaret. 2000. Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Barnes, Barry. 2000. Understanding Agency. Social Theory and Responsible Action. London: Sage.