“A Difficult Weapon to Confiscate” – Ethical Implications of Military Human Enhancement as Reflected in the Science Fiction Genre, Taking Star Trek as an Example-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

“A Difficult Weapon to Confiscate” – Ethical Implications of Military Human Enhancement as Reflected in the Science Fiction Genre, Taking Star Trek as an Example

Published:2020 Issue: Volume: Page:235-260
ISSN:2524-5465
Container-title:Ethics of Medical Innovation, Experimentation, and Enhancement in Military and Humanitarian Contexts
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Vongehr Frederik

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-030-36319-2_14

Reference78 articles.

1. Allhoff, Fritz, Patrick Lin, James Moor, and John Weckert. 2009. Ethics of human enhancement. 25 questions & answers. San Luis: Obispo.

2. Auf dem Hövel, Jörg: Gehirn-Doping. 2007. Augen geradeaus. Telepolis, October 23. http://www.heise.de/tp/artikel/26/26412/1.html . Retrieved on 22 Mar 2016.

3. Barad, Judith A. 2001. The ethics of Star Trek. New York: HarperCollins World.

4. Bartz, Oliver, and Aimé Jäschner. 2015. Evaluation von Human Performance Enhancement (HPE) unter sportwissenschaftlichen Aspekten. Wehrmedizinische Monatsschrift 59: 311–315.

5. Biller-Andorno, Nikola, and Michelle Salathé. 2012. Human Enhancement. Einführung und Definition. In Medizin für Gesunde? Analysen und Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Human Enhancement, ed. Akademien der Wissenschaften Schweiz, 10–18. Bern: Akademien der Wissenschaften Schweiz.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Neuroenhancements in the Military: A Mixed-Method Pilot Study on Attitudes of Staff Officers to Ethics and Rules;Neuroethics;2022-02-28