Abstract
AbstractA large share of natural scientists considers the application of genetic engineering (GE) to be necessary for a sustainable transformation of agriculture. However, there is a stark divergence between scientific assessment and public perception of this technology, particularly in Germany. So far, science communication has not been able to reconcile this divergence. The chapter suggests that strong moral convictions hinder effective science communication and provides scientific evidence for this claim. Furthermore, the chapter presents research suggesting that strong moral convictions can be mitigated through shared moral goals. Building on this insight, recommendations for improved science communication about GE are formulated.
Publisher
Springer Nature Switzerland
Reference109 articles.
1. Ali, S.M., Khalid, B., Akhter, A., Islam, A., Adnan, S.: Analyzing the occurrence of floods and droughts in connection with climate change in Punjab province. Pakistan. Nat. Hazards (Dordr.). 103, 2533–2559 (2020)
2. Woodward, A.J., Samet, J.M.: Climate change, hurricanes, and health. Am. J. Public Health. 108, 33–35 (2018)
3. Kc, K.B., et al.: When too much isn’t enough: does current food production meet global nutritional needs? PLoS One. 13, e0205683 (2018)
4. European Commission: A European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy. Retrieved February 27, 2020, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0773 (2018)
5. Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft: Nationale Politikstrategie Bioökonomie, Nachwachsende Ressourcen und biotechnologische Verfahren als Basis für Ernährung, Industrie und Energie, BMEL (2014)