Author:
Piton Guillaume,Arfaoui Nabila,Gnonlonfin Amandine,Marchal Roxane,Moncoulon David,Douai Ali,Tacnet Jean-Marc
Abstract
AbstractThe Brague River basin (68 km2) is located on the French Mediterranean coast. It experiences a high risk of flash floods. The potential efficacy and efficiency of flood protection strategies based on green (Nature Based Solutions: NBS) or grey (civil-engineering) measures, as well as their co-benefits, are studied in this chapter. Two NBS flood alleviation strategies combine both small natural water retention areas, along with a widening of the river corridor. Two more classical grey scenarios were based on large wood-trapping racks, and another based on retention dams. This chapter synthesizes (i) the flood risk assessment; (ii) the estimation of total costs; (iii) how benefits related to each strategy were estimated. Benefits were evaluated with both a top-down method (avoided damages and transfer of valuations made elsewhere for co-benefits) and with a bottom-up approach surveying citizen willingness to pay. The cost-benefit analysis demonstrates that costs are higher than the avoided damage, and that co-benefits are much higher than avoided damage for most strategies and for both approaches. Depending on the number of household considered in the co-benefits valuation, the balance may reach higher benefits than costs for NBS strategies, though not for the grey solution based on large dams.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference30 articles.
1. Arfaoui N, Gnonlonfin A (2020a) Supporting NBS restoration measures: a test of VBN theory in the Brague catchment. Econ Bull 40(2):1272–1280. [online] https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebl/ecbull/eb-20-00134.html. Accessed 19 Mar 2021
2. Arfaoui N, Gnonlonfin A (2020b) Testing Meta-Regression Analysis in the context of NBS restoration measures: the case of Brague River. Working paper ESDES n°2020-02. [online] Available from: https://www.esdes.fr/medias/fichier/wp-esdes-2020-01-arfaoui-gnonlonfin_1579084075949-pdf. Accessed 16 May 2020
3. Bladé E, Cea L, Corestein G, Escolano E, Puertas J, Vázquez-Cendón E, Dolz J, Coll A (2014) Iber: herramienta de simulación numérica del flujo en r𝚤os. Revista Internacional de Métodos Numéricos para Cálculo y Diseño en Ingenier𝚤a 30:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rimni.2012.07.004
4. Bokhove O, Kelmanson MA, Kent T, Piton G, Tacnet JM (2019) Communicating (nature-based) flood-mitigation schemes using flood-excess volume. River Res Appl 35:1402–1414. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3507
5. Bokhove O, Kelmanson MA, Kent T, Piton G, Tacnet JM (2020) A cost-effectiveness protocol for flood-mitigation plans based on Leeds’ boxing day 2015 floods. Water 12:1–30. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030652